Thursday, December 24, 2009

Benchmarking in management


Benchmarking is the process of comparing the business processes and performance metrics including cost, cycle time, productivity, or quality to another that is widely considered to be an industry standard benchmark or best practice. Essentially, benchmarking provides a snapshot of the performance of your business and helps you understand where you are in relation to a particular standard. The result is often a business case and "Burning Platform" for making changes in order to make improvements. The term benchmarking was first used by cobblers to measure people's feet for shoes. They would place someone's foot on a "bench" and mark it out to make the pattern for the shoes. Benchmarking is most used to measure performance using a specific indicator (cost per unit of measure, productivity per unit of measure, cycle time of x per unit of measure or defects per unit of measure) resulting in a metric of performance that is then compared to others.

Also referred to as "best practice benchmarking" or "process benchmarking", it is a process used in management and particularly strategic management, in which organizations evaluate various aspects of their processes in relation to best practice companies' processes, usually within a peer group defined for the purposes of comparison. This then allows organizations to develop plans on how to make improvements or adapt specific best practices, usually with the aim of increasing some aspect of performance. Benchmarking may be a one-off event, but is often treated as a continuous process in which organizations continually seek to improve their

Types of benchmarking

  • Process benchmarking - the initiating firm focuses its observation and investigation of business processes with a goal of identifying and observing the best practices from one or more benchmark firms. Activity analysis will be required where the objective is to benchmark cost and efficiency; increasingly applied to back-office processes where outsourcing may be a consideration.
  • Financial benchmarking - performing a financial analysis and comparing the results in an effort to assess your overall competitiveness and productivity.
  • Benchmarking from an investor perspective- extending the benchmarking universe to also compare to peer companies that can be considered alternative investment opportunities from the perspective of an investor.
  • Performance benchmarking - allows the initiator firm to assess their competitive position by comparing products and services with those of target firms.
  • Product benchmarking - the process of designing new products or upgrades to current ones. This process can sometimes involve reverse engineering which is taking apart competitors products to find strengths and weaknesses.
  • Strategic benchmarking - involves observing how others compete. This type is usually not industry specific, meaning it is best to look at other industries.
  • Functional benchmarking - a company will focus its benchmarking on a single function in order to improve the operation of that particular function. Complex functions such as Human Resources, Finance and Accounting and Information and Communication Technology are unlikely to be directly comparable in cost and efficiency terms and may need to be disaggregated into processes to make valid comparison.
  • Best-in-class benchmarking - involves studying the leading competitor or the company that best carries out a specific function.
  • Operational benchmarking - embraces everything from staffing and productivity to office flow and analysis of procedures performed.

The following is an example of a typical benchmarking methodology:

  1. Identify your problem areas - Because benchmarking can be applied to any business process or function, a range of research techniques may be required. They include: informal conversations with customers, employees, or suppliers; exploratory research techniques such as focus groups; or in-depth marketing research, quantitative research, surveys, questionnaires, re-engineering analysis, process mapping, quality control variance reports, or financial ratio analysis. Before embarking on comparison with other organizations it is essential that you know your own organization's function, processes; base lining performance provides a point against which improvement effort can be measured.
  2. Identify other industries that have similar processes - For instance if one were interested in improving hand offs in addiction treatment he/she would try to identify other fields that also have hand off challenges. These could include air traffic control, cell phone switching between towers, transfer of patients from surgery to recovery rooms.
  3. Identify organizations that are leaders in these areas - Look for the very best in any industry and in any country. Consult customers, suppliers, financial analysts, trade associations, and magazines to determine which companies are worthy of study.
  4. Survey companies for measures and practices - Companies target specific business processes using detailed surveys of measures and practices used to identify business process alternatives and leading companies. Surveys are typically masked to protect confidential data by neutral associations and consultants.
  5. Visit the "best practice" companies to identify leading edge practices - Companies typically agree to mutually exchange information beneficial to all parties in a benchmarking group and share the results within the group.
  6. Implement new and improved business practices - Take the leading edge practices and develop implementation plans which include identification of specific opportunities, funding the project and selling the ideas to the organization for the purpose of gaining demonstrated value from the process.  


The BCG matrix ( Boston Consulting Group analysis) is a chart that had been created by Bruce Henderson for the Boston Consulting Group in 1968 to help corporations with analyzing their business units or product lines. This helps the company allocate resources and is used as an analytical tool in brand marketing, product management, strategic management, and portfolio analysis.

DMADV

DMADV


The DMADV project methodology, also known as DFSS ("Design For Six Sigma"), features five phases:

• Define design goals that are consistent with customer demands and the enterprise strategy.

• Measure and identify CTQs (characteristics that are Critical To Quality), product capabilities, production process capability, and risks.

• Analyze to develop and design alternatives, create a high-level design and evaluate design capability to select the best design.

• Design details, optimize the design, and plan for design verification. This phase may require simulations.

• Verify the design, set up pilot runs, implement the production process and hand it over to the process owners.


DMAIC

DMAIC


The DMAIC project methodology has five phases:

• Define high-level project goals and the current process.

• Measure key aspects of the current process and collect relevant data.

• Analyze the data to verify cause-and-effect relationships. Determine what the relationships are, and attempt to ensure that all factors have been considered.

• Improve or optimize the process based upon data analysis using techniques like Design of experiments.

• Control to ensure that any deviations from target are corrected before they result in defects. Set up pilot runs to establish process capability, move on to production, set up control mechanisms and continuously monitor the process.


six sigma in management

Six Sigma originated as a set of practices designed to improve manufacturing processes and eliminate defects, but its application was subsequently extended to other types of business processes as well In Six Sigma, a defect is defined as anything that could lead to customer dissatisfaction.


Bill Smith first formulated the particulars of the methodology at Motorola in 1986. Six Sigma was heavily inspired by six preceding decades of quality improvement methodologies such as quality control, TQM, and Zero Defects, based on the work of pioneers such as Shewhart, Deming, Juran, Ishikawa, Taguchi and others.


MANAGEMENT COLLEGES IN TAMILNADU

 Top colleges for Mba

1.Guindy college of engineering,chennai
2.PSG College, Coimbatore
3.Thiyagaraja college of technology,Madurai
4.SSN college,chennai
5.CIT, Coimbatore
6.velammal college of engineering, Chennai.
7.Mepco ,sivakasi
8.MOP vaishnav college for women,
9.sri sairam college of engineering ,chennai
10.sona college of technology, Salem
11.St.Joseph's college of engineering
12Srm university,chennai.
13.Jeppiaar engineering college,chennai.
14. Loyola college,chennai
15.Easwari engineering college,chennai.
16.sri venkateswara college of engineering,chennai.
16.VIT.vellore
17.Hindustan college,chennai
18.Ethiraj college for women,chennai
19.sri Krishna college of engineering and technology,coimbatore
20.NIT,Trichy
21.GCT,Coimbatore